This paper, however, critically examines the machinations of public sentiment immediately following a controversial Supreme Court decision. Most scholarship pertaining to the Supreme Court’s “school prayer” cases remains focused solely on Establishment and Free Exercise variables, or the political and moral significance for twenty-first century youths. Curlett and the American Mind” examines popular response to Supreme Court action, specifically focusing on the methods used by the majority to manipulate public sentiment for the purpose of counteracting judicial decrees. Elsbree, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs. Download PDF Check Treatment Red flags, copy-with-cite, case summaries, annotated statutes and more. The Supreme Court’s verdict became a target of public outrage, as well as a tool for the dispossession of the disbelieving minority. 3 Citing Cases From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Schempp v. The prevailing national discourse that emerged during the following school year represented a relatively united organization against the ruling, based primarily on moral, rather than legal, grounds. Schempp, removed the Lord’s Prayer and Bible reading from public schools in 1963. Neutrality among religious groups must be honored. Curlett, decided in conjunction with School District of Abington Township v. Court ruled that special school district was unconstitutional and fails the test of Neutrality.
0 kommentar(er)
